units

New rent-stabilized units have strict income limits during the application process [1], and individual existing units have income limits.

The ATF can't just destroy the entire nation's set of self-storage units because they found drugs or pirate DVDs in some of the units.

The only difference between the regulated units and mine is what would happen if the building changed owners.

Google's plan for office space was even rejected because it didn't have enough new housing units!

Lots of anger and protests, despite the fact that addition of luxury stock should in fact decrease prices on other units.

The number of units under price ceiling have an insignificant impact on the market anyway.

For dealing with heterogeneous bases, as with measuring in imperial units, take a look at the fraction notation in Fibonacci’s book.

Make the neighborhood more desirable by whatever means, more middle/upper-class people want to live there, local landlords raise the rent on existing units despite no actual change in their quality?

I also thought he was full of it, thinking he was advocating for a base-12 system of units.

The regulated units meanwhile would continue to only raise at 2-3% per year.

The places that are really cheap also don't show a huge amount of change because even after increases the units are still rent controlled.

Rent stabilization is only applicable to units costing $2500 or less (regardless of size), in buildings built between February 1, 1947 and January 1, 1974.

Two example "units" for two example "teams" (4 units total), 2 maps, but plenty of documentation, allowing the community to create a fuller game?

Soldiers in small military units, startups, and again, sports see similar "effects".