superheroes

This is related to the observation that while superheroes are frequently rich, they never earned the money themselves.

For the most part, superheroes can't help what they are - they became that way through genetics or accident.

Group 3 probably have some training and group 4 probably have some programming related experience, or maybe they are superheroes.

It's just a tool in his box to make mature art for mature people who are beyond superheroes, and beyond good and evil.

His point about superheroes being detractors from reality is an interesting one.

Thinking about the post, I quite understand why people don't want to work with such superheroes.

This grows from my theory that superheroes are disastrous for humankind.

The mistakes of superheroes involve too many of us in disaster.

Lawyers who can do that for truly loathsome clients are superheroes.

In addition to learning about the stack, I also realized that superheroes are human, too.

Almost never do superheroes make, create, or build anything.

Now we’re essentially all consuming very childish things – comic books, superheroes...

Side note: Who made the "superheroes" on your homepage?

> "Almost never do superheroes make, create, or build anything.

In folklore/fiction the superheroes are only optimized on a limited set of abilities or if they are too super we throw in "an Achilles heel"/"a Kryptonite".

And if it is expected of everyone, then they are not "superheroes" (exceptional individuals) anymore, only regular employees, and the regular ones (those who have a life outside work) are pushed down to the mediocre employee category.

Superheroes movies are the most profitable, the video game industry is enormous.

Superheroes are a fun, stupid and occasionally brilliant genre.