comics

The Economist is weekly, and sounds like what he's suggesting, sans comics and crossword puzzle.

Just because the author gets warm feelings reading evening news and comics, doesn't mean there are many people who feels the same.

GP didn't dis comics, he's dissing filmmakers who can't tell the difference between a comic and a movie.

The Comics Code Authority was not part of the government, but it was a censor.

You seem to like comics that summarize one side of the story.

I grew up reading multiple newspapers a day, waited anxiously for comics or movie reviews.

At the time I had only a passing interest in graphic novels and comics.

The first part (comics, light reading) has been done.

You write theatrical plays, social and political philosophy, satire, comics, songs, whatever.

Don't get me wrong, I am a fan of most of Cameron's work, the Terminator mythology (I even still have the old Terminator comics published by Dark Horse) and Aliens (also have the Dark Horse comics) probably more so than anything else.

(Superhero) comics were originally children's entertainment, almost a century ago.

(Superhero) comics are not original form for entertainment of our time; we should come up with something new of our own that reflects our time, not just repeat the same and old and tired.

Also reminds me of some of the points made in Understanding Comics[0] "...

We recently launched the first "Netflix for Comics" - really exciting stuff!

I am annoyed by people who claim to be "geeks" and "nerds" because they read comics and watch Marvel movies, but who are amazingly ignorant about science.

I love Marvel movies and read comics myself, but I know enough real-world knowledge to place them into the realm of "sheer awesome/entertaining nonsense." A world full of people who lack the pieces of their high-school education to do just that is kinda a scary place.

Comics and puzzle is not good enough to sell newspaper.