robo

You can bet these robo-cars will be getting robo-tire-rotations and any other effeciencies they can squeeze out.

What does this mean, that the robo advisor is based off of decades of Nobel Prize winning research?

That said, why do you think your robo advisors will be better at this than Vanguard's target retirement funds?

They claim $0 fees and still do the robo advising (i.e., solving the portfolio allocation problem).

First, the guy making robo-concubines is just strange, in a scientific sort of way.

They can compete with robo-advisors without spending millions or hundreds of thousands on technology.

The robo-delivery-van won't only lack a steering wheel, it will lack a seat.

Even the cheapest robo-advisors like Betterment charge 0.1-0.3% on top of the fund fees, which sounds small but eats into gains over time.

Also - how does your fiduciary duty obligation jive with your robo advisor, which I assume is an automated process?

If Uber can operate 100,000 robo-cars in San Fran you can walk up to the sidewalk and press Hail and presto you have your ride.

They can dynamically balance load between nearby cities on a day-by-day even hourly basis dispatching streams of robo-cars from their garages when the surges hit.

The do not call list has an exception for robo-campaign call.

If "startups" concern you, check out Schwab's robo-advisor service or, better, get a Vanguard LifeStrategy fund.

Until a robot voice gets an appealing personality that people enjoy talking to, people will avoid interacting with "robo voices" if at all possible.

We offer paperless administration to employers and automatic ("robo") advising to employees.

Was it to convey that these robo-concubines are "in the future" or "some time in the future"?

Robo dialing wants to avoid less than 6 second calls, and generally keep their average answer ratio and call duration up.