journals

Her journals did not become radioactive because they were neutron-activated, but because they were contaminated by radioactive material.

Since it was so close to the blast, wouldn't it still be radioactive, like Marie Curie's journals?

The best scientists do not design their experiments with a goal of publishing in top tier journals.

And some journals can be particularly bad about the feedback, especially some of the lower tier journals, but I guess that's why some people go to the low impact journals...

He claimed that Epstein publishes primarily opinion pieces in scientific journals, which are then cited by activists as if they are actual research.

Thoreau's journals removed a good deal of low-level daily frustration from my life.

That said, even if your quote is accurate, owners of journals can just drop support if they notice they're talking to the wrong audience.

It would be nice to see some studies in credible peer-reviewed journals about the efficacy of direct marketing at getting consumers to buy their products.

However, a lot of blogs, journals, books etc.

It isn't a list of comments from random people on the internet, it's a list of scientific journals and websites which you, yourself, would recognize as being respectable sources.

I also have university access to academic journals that aren't public.

And, again, I'm not suggesting we stop using the word in technical contexts (the classroom, textbooks, journals, etc.).

>"The process of peer review and publication in the interactive scientific journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) differs from traditional scientific journals.

The pessimist in me thinks it's a pretty optimal "showcase" example though:P On a related note, don't some fields/journals (like pharmacology is in my head for some reason) require ref reports to be made public?