journal

3 years as a rockstar engineer with a company that made the cover of a widely read technical journal.

And I'm not convinced that's publishable in any sort of competitive journal.

As best as we can tell, he is being charged with allegedly downloading too many scholarly journal articles from the Web.

Telecom and wireless regulation has spawned thousands of journal articles and thesises.

It's staggeringly obvious if you read the sweep of history as written by journal article titles in, say, Software Practice & Experience, between 1970 and 2010.

It honestly doesn't feel like a topic for a physics journal even though a reliable positive result would have profound implications for physics.

The biggest issue that I see with publishing this work in a physics journal is that although time travel is certainly a concept in physics, the research involved here is not physics research.

He died while the 16th patient was still recovering from surgery in hospital.> The project ended with his death.> “When he died, there was no medical journal on the 16 patients, with myself being the first one implanted.

I got to the issue a few years late, saw the WillNotFix tickets, and wrote up - I kid you not - an on-dead-tree journal article which said:[W]rite access to sensitive data should be limited to the maximum extent practical.

In the same way, I wouldn't expect a technical article reporting measurements of carbon flow in the environment to be published in a political science journal, even though climate change might have profound implications for global politics.

Those researchers have told me about other researchers who are trying to clean up the published literature in psychology, for example Jelte Wicherts, whose article "Letting the daylight in: reviewing the reviewers and other ways to maximize transparency in science"[2] in an open-access journal suggests general procedures to improve scientific publishing, for example by changing the incentive structure around reviewing papers submitted for publication.