gases

The heat from the combustion is transferred to the gases inside the cylinder, causing them to expand.

The meat industry is still the main producer of greenhouse gases but it's really getting astoundingly efficient, producing more food by producing less greenhouse gases.

The thing is, it's not just the temperature measurements fitting the greenhouse gases.

It never occurred to me that human-produced carbon-dioxide was such a small percent of the greenhouse gases.

In Frank's case, he just always gases early, often by the end of the first round.

Otherwise, the O2 usually ends up oxidizing anything it can touch, and gets bound up in minerals, or as oxygen-containing gases.

Producing 2% of the world's greenhouse gases is not bad at all if California performs 2+% of the world's greenhouse gas-producing activities.

Nuclear power plants are of course more efficient and do not produce greenhouse gases.

Similar to taxing the finite capacity of the atmosphere to absorb greenhouse gases.

But that's a tiny fraction of the heat trapped by excess greenhouse gases.

The effects of greenhouse gases are mild compared with planetary collisions or large volcanic eruptions so it's unlikely any positive feedback loop will occur.

They are saying that, despite the complexities, despite the many variables, an increase in one of the least significant greenhouse gases will cause catastrophic (the word is everywhere - cue the screaming girl) warming.

Occaissionally, you will get someone on the inside to write something very brave: "But I am also aware that in this thick atmosphere -and I am not speaking of greenhouse gases now- editors, reviewers and authors of alternative studies, analysis, interpretations,even based on the same data we have at our disposal, have been bullied and subtly blackmailed.