families

Look at EA if you want to see what crunch does (besides make your employees and families miserable).

Plus, they do a lot to raise money for the community (helping local HS groups, families in need, etc.).

Which would require either that families get part-time jobs, or that one of them be 'the breadwinner'.

What that graph shows is what families were worth over a 14 year periods for a bunch of cohorts.

We combine the power of stories with the possibilities of technology, to create magical, personalised experiences for kids and their families.

Millennial families also have to deal with the stigma of 24/7 supervision of their children.

The compromise here that would keep workplaces fair, is to not compromise for families, and force everyone to work the same hours.

Most of the families I've talked to around my neighborhood want to move out to a better / safer place.

Staying warm and dry was a real problem, and it wasn't unusual for families and sometimes friends to share a bed because of it.

You get families out barbecuing on the sidewalk, the kids playing in the water, people stopping to douse their heads or wash their hands.

I seem to recall reading about families that have lived there for 3 generations since the 1920s and were still residents.

We recognize that we each have lives, activities, and families outside of work.

I think the key part in the article may be this: "Instead, the company’s true feat is setting up a distribution model and payment infrastructure that West African families and community leaders are comfortable with." A distribution model that goes through community leaders has built-in trust.

Because the question isn't "Do I have time to both work and raise this child", it's "How can I be at the office and dropping Timmy off at soccer practice at the same time?" To make everything fair between single workers and working families you'd have to allow a workforce-wide reduction in hours, possibly accompanied by hiring more.