encyclopedic

I would go so far as to say someone with that kind of encyclopedic understanding of a language is a negative indicator.

But Wikipedia as an encyclopedic repository is never going to be a good venue for controversial topics.

It's perfectly encyclopedic to note that a major critic believes that an author was inspired by a particular person.

The lists in this article may contain items that are not notable, encyclopedic, or helpful.

Taxonomists need basically a good eye for picking subtle differences in 3D structures and an encyclopedic knowledge of the life forms.

Yes, the GCs you've heard of constitutes an encyclopedic listing of them.

Personally, I just quit editing after 15 years (12 as an administrator) in protest at the deletion of good encyclopedic content.

I press dot and within 10 milliseconds I see an encyclopedic list of functions, complete with verifiable hints as to their structure.

But if you want to use it reliably, with the provided library functions, you need to keep an encyclopedic knowledge of the aforementioned edge cases gotchas.

With encyclopedic content, the consensus 'fact' is useful, plus the level and strength of general agreement over time is useful, plus the alternative 'facts' are useful.

This isn't encyclopedic understanding; it's one level above novice.

To accurately follow someone else's perl requires either an encyclopedic knowledge of the language and it's edge cases or very heavy documentation and a set standard of coding practices.

The manual had an extensive "encyclopedic" section that was part background material, part hint book, and part ingenious copy protection.

The problem for many of the site's writers is that the "encyclopedic" stuff is done.

If I am at the point where I don't have a good idea of what functions I will be using, than the "encyclopedic list of functions" is just not going to be a help.

While it was dealing with "encyclopedic" topics it was fine, but now that the encyclopedia part is pretty much done, editors are building up pages that are actually news archives, a task the wiki software does not handle well.

Encyclopedic knowledge is only a fraction of human value.

Encyclopedic knowledge is great, but the real trick is dumping everything possible offline and then knowing how and when you should get back to looking at it.

Encyclopedic knowledge of privacy tech and law.