diffraction

You can also use your layers of atoms as a diffraction grating and gather information from the diffraction pattern formed by the electron beam too.

In particular, some of these jump point rules look alot like diffraction (of a wave) around a boundary.

Nope because that is limited by the diffraction limit for white light or evescent propogation for FL.

Or shining a laser pointer at a hair to see the diffraction pattern?

The way I see it, both the diffraction theorists and the crystallization experimentalists deserve credit.

There is also the diffraction limit[0] which, until materials are developed which have negative refractive indexes for visible light, imposes a maximum on the available resolution.

The data side makes a great diffraction spectrometer.

You have reflection, diffraction and scattering as possibilities.

There is no method for capturing a full 3D model in experiment, although we can get projections from X-Ray diffraction and other scattering methods.

It seems likely that any application that uses diffraction has higher-order effects that send part of the light in unwanted directions, even if there is a distinct focus.

You may wish to use a wider aperture, on a 28mm lens and with modern sensors, f/22 is likely to show blurring from diffraction through the small aperture.

X-ray diffraction is essentially 3D Fourier analysis.

More importantly, no atmospheric "diffusion" is required to spread out the incoming light, because it's occurring anyway through diffraction at the camera's aperture.

The diffraction limit (how much an 8” telescope can magnify) is 3.05 mircorad.

When waves bend around corners, it's called "diffraction", and when waves bend in empty space, it's called "divergence".

It's not xrays, it's "extreme ultraviolet" (EUV), plus diffraction-based multiple patterning.

Diffraction limits are most visible for small apertures (high f-numbers).