wavelength

On the other hand, linear dipole would be 1/2-wavelength (or 2 times 1/4-wavelength), as it is just two 1/4-monopoles put together.

You'll notice that 1/4 wavelength antenna will give you the strongest signal, while 1/2 and full wavelength will apparently give no signal at all.

Had it been needed, we would have done it, but I'm glad the community is on the same wavelength that we are.

That's dangerous because it starts you down the road of thinking of colors as having a wavelength.

Now, that being said, one real advantage is that the effective wavelength tends to be much smaller.

Is it not just a wavelength of light hitting your eye, and your brain interpreting it?

Also your power spectral density would be fairly low as your AM modulation would be distributed over a huge wavelength range.

Filtering by exact wavelength doesn't add a lot; it leaves your message visible in sunlight and incandescent light, at the very least.

Since the wavelength of a color isn't what defines experiencing it, then what does?

And surely you can't say they don't experience it just because of the wavelength.

For example, an electron at 0.9c has an effective wavelength of 1.2pm (picometers).

LMS stands for Long/Medium/Short (wavelength) cones, and I assume most of us know RGB is Red/Green/Blue.

Thats why olympus refers to performance of full-wavelength piece of wire as "random piece of wire"-kind of performance.

Your computer monitor does not actually emit "a pure cornflower-blue wavelength", it exploits the limits of your vision and emits a mix of 2/3 wavelengths that simply seems the same.

Wavelength of 2600Hz at 44100Hz sampling rate would be slightly under 17 samples, so any repeating string of 17 single-byte characters would do (44100/17 = 2594Hz, dunno if that's close enough).