voter

It could mean that the system is 'secure' in providing an accurate tally of voter intentions, or that it is 'secure' in assuring the desired outcome for whoever is in control.

However nobody cared to enforce them, theirfore the EU is based on lies and would never have been exepted by any voter if it had been known.

Discussion and debate in the US is dead, as the left will not engage in anything that could alter their voter base, and the incentives provided to them.

To the average German voter money for Greece without reforms is pouring water into a broken bucket.

The programmes are meant to appease the average German voter and serve as a warning to the Spaniards and Italians.

We built the voter contact and volunteer management tools used by Obama for America.

One goes to the voter, the others would go to the vote counters.

Also, what happens if a voter agrees with none of the choices (parties)?

It is like the average computer user feeling slighted by the Microsoft's Embrace, Extend, Extinguish or the average voter feeling slighted by the TPP.

So in a certain sense the entire site is one giant voter ring; we all can vote, but we can't submit.

The manner of weighting would have changed the voter turnout: e.g.

If older people have entrenched views and younger people don't vote, how does this information correlate to election-winning voter swings in the gap between the two?

The average voter will continue to see SS as something "earned" rather than the entitlement program it [already] is.

The blog post mentioned there was 16.5% "voter turnout".

I also believe collusion ratings could be found very high in cases where this is not a "voter ring" issue, but more an issue of who has a better network and/or is better at marketing.

I don't understand - California "issued as a license to drive a motor vehicle; it does not establish eligibility for employment, voter registration, or public benefits." Why would the acquisition of a state license for driving affect one's federal immigration status?