volumes

It's disrespectful and speaks volumes about the person spouting off and nothing about who he's going off on.

Yes, they're in VMs, but recoverable/reschedule-able persistent volumes in container clusters are at best experimental features anywhere you look.

Not impossible, but a right pain to keep your chosen strain dominant in the sort of volumes that area implies.

But for us our volumes are low, and their API makes it worth it.

Maybe that's why some people study the liberal arts and sciences and go on to write entire volumes on these sorts of topics.

Use volumes to map some other storage, but then you have to have some way of mapping storage to containers outside of Docker.

They address the coercion (either by law enforcement or guy with a gun), by allowing you to make hidden volumes inside the main volume.

Add to that that moving volumes around is still an issue and...

Do you ever plan on discounts for volumes like shown above?

Problem: now you have to move huge volumes of water.

I think it speaks volumes that I like writing Python but like deploying Go.

Those would be volume while we invest some into improving premium aircraft we use in lower volumes such as F-117, F-22, and B-2.

Regarding the "contempt of court" threat, they need to implement hidden volumes, like TrueCrypt does, and that will be addressed.

For example, it supports only one "--volumes-from" argument per container.

Generally when I hear the term "deniable" used with something security related, I think of something like the hidden volumes in True Crypt: something that I can't be proved to have.