unscientific

It is ridiculous that you are replacing 50 years of work with something so unscientific and vague.

Either they are conflating the results of one study with settled science, or conflating some popular unscientific rumor with real science.

The whole point here is that unscientific nonsense needs to be killed.

I just did a quick, unscientific test using a 3.5 MB bundled (but not minimized).js file.

Unfortunately, this seems to be done in a horribly unscientific manner.

Yes by science looking more foolish I meant a science which holds that the existence of a superior being is unscientific.

How profoundly emotional and unscientific (not to mention vile and insulting) Such a claim is extremely complicated (defying occam's razor) and implies some sort of conspiracy that is at the very least questionable without sound proof.

This is an interesting topic, but a very unscientific article.

Here's my unscientific LOC count results (that I did in 5 minutes).

I find a lot of the source article here vague and unscientific.

But if you want to talk practicality of holding unscientific beliefs: I see your harmless gluten-free food industry and raise you a measles outbreak...

A high-level unscientific explanation I've had is basically folks prone to addiction feel like heroin or whatever replaces the feelings of success and companionship etc.

Some people, however, do the unscientific thing of deducing backwards: they pre-suppose "innate" superiority, and then project backwards from power to superiority.

They didn't want to give it to "skeptics" because these "skeptics" were anomaly hunting the data to try and make an unscientific argument sound scientific.

Elf believers might be upset and say "But you haven't yet proved with absolute certainty that there are no magical elves!" and they would be correct - but they are being unscientific when they say "I'm pretty sure there are those elves!" Similarly, intelligent design fans, who must embrace DarwinLoses if they have even a chance to be correct, have yet to show one single piece of evidence against DarwinWins.