subjectivity

People may draw different conclusions for subjective reasons, but that subjectivity is in the people, not the statistics.

The questions being asked are the unhelpful ones and signify a general obsession with semantics, subjectivity and language tricks.

The leads to a lot of subjectivity and grey areas for debate that a mathematician may not be accustomed to.

And the worst thing is that these strategies aren't any better in managing subjectivity and prejudice.

Another example of the subjectivity of UX and need for UI to be explicit and versatile I guess.

I appreciate your point of view, but doesn't this deny human nature, replacing subjectivity with a kind of sterile mechanistic objectivity?

We probably have different understandings of subjectivity and objectivity.

The talk about the subjectivity of color is misleading.

• Both shallow and deep RNNs capture aspects of subjectivity, but deep RNNs seem to better handle the expression boundaries.

'Fuzzy logic' may be a better fit since individual subjectivity isn't always that amenable to quantification.

There is a big deal of subjectivity (e.g.

You can gather all the data in the world about reddit users and their mannerisms, but that does not change the way the logic behind 'objectivity' and 'subjectivity' work.

There's some subjectivity as to what is "important" in making an argument.

People talk about it like it's a subjectivity problem, that we need to "change our attitudes" about genders and minorities in tech.

There's some subjectivity as far as "processing" goes.

However I have a hunch Hiley's idea of "process" is not so remote from Fuchs' notions of subjectivity and what that means for quantum theory.