unicellular

And unicellular creatures built our oxygen atmosphere, so the loss of it probably won't bother them too much.

This communication ability has evolved before the multicellular animals, in the colonies of unicellular ancestors of animals (e.g.

What is the journey from an unicellular ancestor to modern humans if not a decrease in entropy?

How's plopping a couple of unicellular organisms on a planet help us learn to do it ourselves?

As another poster has said, most unicellular eukaryotes are either attracted or repelled by light and this is very simple to observe.

Maybe the conditions for unicellular life only occur on 1% of nominally terrestrial worlds.

I'm no expert, but in my understanding the transition from unicellular to multicellular can go pretty smoothly via symbiosis.

In an unicellular organism, a part of the cell senses light and another part, like flagella or contractile filaments reacts, moving the cell.

The most successful life forms on this planet are the unicellular ones.

If life was inherently fair we'd all still be a soup of completely equal unicellular organisms.

I see no similar obvious reason not to extrapolate caffeine/yeast combo to humans other than the usual multi-cellular vs unicellular issues.

A human fetus follows the path paved by its ancestors, evolving in the womb from unicellular, to amphibian, to mammal, to man.

(If we replace fish by "unicellular organism", it might be easier to get to "what kind of (meta)game gets them to multicellularity"?) Note that narcissism is what PH/Kohut is trying to breakup here.