toys

Maybe one day in the far future they might be useful, but in the meantime they're basically toys.

Everybody is cooking their own soup and no-one wants to share their toys and sandbox with the other children.

If the MM toys still have trademark protection why shouldn't Steamboat Willie go to public domain?

They'll even be happy to pass along gently used clothes and outgrown toys.

They want action, they want to play with their toys.

I got into electronics by pulling apart toys and looking what makes them tick, there's no reason the same couldn't be done for code.

Don't send useless expensive toys out to interact with people in what you know are poor areas (even if, well, you didn't choose that to be where it went).

I'm somewhat puzzled how in the US small children and people with inflatable toys are all sharing one big free-for-all deep pool with the adults.

About companies this is what I think: If Mickey Mouse goes off copyright, sure there would be copycats making Mickey toys and not paying royalties/fees.

:p That said, I cook basically every night, and I've got some toys I suspect you'd enjoy.

People say Apple is a tech company or a toys for millenials company, but I claim that fundamentally Apple is a user experience company (maybe the only one).

This is prevalent all over the world, here in South Africa for example If you look for example at childrens books and toys there is also a lack of representation of black skin colour.

That doesn't mean that anyone can make "copycat" Mickey Mouse toys, infringing on Disney's trademark.

* "Reuters reported that expensive toys were being purchased by MtGox/Mark.

> I'm not sure it's ignoring everything - as this article states, electric planes exist today Prop toys exist, not "future of aviation" anything.

So, for example, if a user submitted the query "barbie doll", the endpoint would return the three most likely categories: "toys", "clothes" and let's say "office supplies".

Toys were going to be flung far and wide, heads were going to roll.