Company used in a sentence

Company in a sentence as a noun

"Built a company with real revenues from nothing.

The company can fail, but if you come out of it better than you came in, you still succeeded.

* Getting a company funded and then running it is a resume plus.

In all my years on this planet I have never been pleased with a telecom company.

But maybe, just maybe, Sony isn't the company to do business with anymore?

* If your payables and debts are all in the company's name, nobody is coming for your house.

You won't have more trouble getting another job than you did getting the one you left to start this company.

I don't relish the idea of building a company and then selling it... but life is more complicated than that.

At best, it'll help you move forward as a company without having these sorts of problems lurking about in the shadows.

He hands out little yellow stickies with his name on them, reminding people "who runs the company" when they disagree with him.

I get on guys' cases all the time when they're being obliquely and overtly sexist, especially in mixed company.

I like to be reassured that a company will, in the long term, fail when its products are cynically designed to manipulate.

Despite what hacker news and TechCrunch try to convince you, running a company is a job just the same as building an engineering system.

Company in a sentence as a verb

It's that when you used to give out free sodas and coffee, and then you stop, you're telling everyone in the company that business isn't as good as it used to be.

It used to be that HP engineers were expressly given Friday afternoons and full access to company resources to just play with new ideas.

This means that the "not getting it" is endemic across the company: the PMs don't get it, the engineers don't get it, the product teams don't get it, nobody gets it.

He was criticizing Apple for trying to take away peoples' freedoms and Steve Jobs for steering the company in this direction. He wasn't condemning him as a person, as he said "My feelings about Jobs as a person are not strong, since I barely knew him.

Think of it this way: had your company been successful, it almost certainly would have left you in a state where you'd be working for someone else for a couple years during your earnout.

Given that they want to wait until after additional fundraising rounds are completed, I doubt that your involvement with the company is nearly so problematic.

The new guy was arguably the most talented guy in the company by a considerable margin, so he thought someone building a $700K home might've been overextending themselves.

From what I gather, such a large shift in focus and investment was a unprecedented in Google before Google+.I think Google is a great company, I have a super high opinion of the people that I met there.

From the time Bezos issued his edict through the time I left, Amazon had transformed culturally into a company that thinks about everything in a services-first fashion.

You've already made a significant investment into the company, and from their perspective, an ideal/successful squeeze-out is one that deprives you of that ownership interest entirely.

More than anything else, this describes an appalling failure at every level of the company's technical infrastructure to ensure even a basic degree of engineering rigor and fault tolerance.

Quite often though industry biases will engage and they'll be put on duty keeping some legacy system alive because their deep knowledge of the system lets the company put 1 guy maintaining half a million lines of code in perpetuity vs. 10 young guys maintaining the same, who all wanting to leave after a few years to build more skills.