sustainable

Typically, people are going to go to a fast-food joint and that ain't too healthy or sustainable either.

But it's no different than any other business, it's either you have a sustainable model, or you don't.

Accumulating a sustainable amount of money isn't as easy as raising a few rounds on a weak idea.

Nickel and diming the artists kills that for a short term hit of profit that isn't sustainable.

Its simply not sustainable to eat from a gourmet chef every day, or even every week.

About you: You’re passionate about sustainable energy and want to play a part of pushing our society in that direction.

Even assuming they near that amount, at $3.99, is it really a sustainable business model?

The reason they're not on a subscription business model is probably because that wouldn't be sustainable for 99% of the sites you use.

If you want social safety nets, you need a homogeneous culture that stresses (irrationally) not taking advantage of them, thereby making them sustainable.

I don't think I've heard of any start-ups which were sustainable at the beginning, whereas many small businesses/hobby projects are.

I agree, but perhaps they may realize quite soon that things might not be sustainable the way they do them.

About us: We’re dedicated to the proliferation of sustainable energy solutions.

To me, the "whole story" is how the website measures the value of its content, how it monetizes it, what % of people never want to return, what is a sustainable audience, etc, etc.

That said, I think RedLaser as it exists now is a "one time thing." It's a product, not a company, and they're going to have to pivot into something more sustainable than "download this app." So $1MM is great, but not as great as $1MM/year.