biodiversity

The earth is getting warming in those areas and it is effecting the sea levels and biodiversity of the planet.

An extinction event is something that destroys biodiversity, and biodiversity is the source of this beauty as I feel it.

Being different carries a value of its own, and it breeds biodiversity that's healthy for the system as a whole.

The animals that don't survive mass extinction events don't benefit from the subsequent biodiversity, that's why.

Sure, most humans will die, but just imagine how great all the biodiversity will be after a few million years!

Reefs are immediately threatened by ocean acidification, warming waters, biodiversity loss, and physical ecosystem destruction.

And even if it did, look at the incredible biodiversity that came to exist afterward!

There have been numerous pieces already about massive honey bee loss, which is going to really suck for North America's biodiversity.

For example, clear cutting tends to completely wipe out the biodiversity of that location.

We've destroyed a lot of natural habitats, and we know that these habitats contain a great deal of biodiversity.

Climate change, biodiversity loss, and ocean acidification will have serious impact on the immediate time scale, and are largely unprecedented in the geological time scale.

But, from historical evidence, so far the metrics of biodiversity and CO2 pollution are very much going in an undesirable direction, with no sign yet of change.

The chapter about human biodiversity in a general handbook on biodiversity says it well: "The massive efforts to study the human genome in detail have produced extraordinary amounts of genetic data.

"Genetic basis of human biodiversity: an update." In Biodiversity Hotspots, pp.

Delve into the right-o-sphere and you immediately run into a ton of "HBD" (human biodiversity, a modern neo-racialist rebranding) type stuff.

There's an awful lot of room for legal "biodiversity" left.