sections

Now the dial is being turned back, and comments sections are beginning to be seen as tacky.

So yes, the 'recent tweets' (and the older posts) sections are at odds with a total minimalist style.

What needs more documentation is the highlighting of sections where Postgres does differently from say, Oracle, MySQL or SqlServer...

Maybe marked by color of source (blue for reddit and orange for hacker news) and separated into submission sections.

I think PG has pretty good reference documentation, with a few weaker sections, but horrible introductory material.

Once Web 2.0 was a thing, everybody had comment sections.

Beyond factual claims about Christ, there are many other sections of the Bible which would become fatal to the central Christian message were they proven false.

Did you expand the sections in the Privacy Statement [1]?

I also think its brilliant that the sub-sections are maintained by others, who seem to have set up *-awesomeness repo's for each subject..

Most Internet comment sections are unmitigated dumpster fires.

- Whole sections of the city are overrun with homeless people (tenderloin, golden gate park near Stanyan) such that passers by may be attacked, etc.

> Once Web 2.0 was a thing, everybody had comment sections.

Over the years I have grown one huge notebook called "Learning" with tons of sections on every conceivable subject.

But I get very, very tired of people taking a poorly researched article that takes major sections of a report out of context (yes, I'm aware that Axe published the whole thing, but he still doesn't draw the correct conclusions from it) and then using that to say, "See?

Open the page in Firefox or Chrome, hit F12 to get to the browser console, then run this to expand all the sections: $('.learnMoreLabel').click() If you search the page for "disclose", you'll see that that exact wording is no longer present, but very similar wording is in the "Reasons We Share Personal Data" and "Skype - Partner companies" sections.