reviewing

Do you think the person reviewing the submission is putting multiple hours into it.

In my enviroment (slow finance, seen a few firms, second line hence the reviewing of many a workhorse).

Like it or not, the current legal framework makes it a bad idea to have employees reviewing our content.

My team handles this by committing to personal dev branches, then reviewing relatively small merges to mainline.

I started reviewing sites I'd purchased with online wondering where my details might have been leaking out.

It'd be cool if whoever is reviewing these, or someone involved in the process, could scan them in and make a public repository.

I actually wouldn't mind reviewing some apps, but not at the expense of having to start Google+.

Right, but if that's the only change made, reviewing find-and-replace is trivial.

I was just thinking about this the other day when reviewing my amazon receipt.

It seems like most company's legal docs are a mess (and I know from reviewing lots of them when I was an attorney).

'Course, then I'd have to trust that the people reviewing the code knew what they were doing.

The devs reviewing the code don't even know how long it took for the applicant to return, and it isn't a criteria we use to judge them.

"I'm not interested in that kind of work" is a fair answer, but it seems pretty rude to dismiss it as an ugly hacky legacy code base without reviewing it first.

Even if you didn't have someone in the loop pulling the trigger, then you'd have a bunch of engineers (or more likely Amazon turkers) sitting back and reviewing after action video filling out precision-recall reports, that read "Misidentified school bus as troop transport at 1:37.

"At the core of the problem is that this approach can be used to burn a lot of a candidate's time without an equivalent investment from the company." Maybe a tweak would be to only offer take home projects to candidates only after committing to bring them in for an on-site interview, then the interview consists mostly of reviewing the code from the take home.

It's even better if these code reviewers are responsible for “maintaining” the code they are reviewing so that they are incentivized to make the right long-term trade-offs This makes sense at first but don't you also want more people looking at the code who don't have complete context so that the context must be explained to them and then they can learn more about the code base?

Reviewing my startup numbers and analytics 6.

Reviewing my productized consultancy analytics 5.