reissue

I think startssl requires $$$$ to revoke and/or reissue those "free" certs before they expire :-/

I don't want to reissue a token if I don't have to, but I don't want to create permanent tokens either.

If a buy order is placed against that quoted price, she has the right to reissue quotes elsewhere.

Not making revocation free of cost isn't refusal to reissue cert.

It has been quite long enough since the Stratfor data breach for the CC companies to close & reissue new card numbers.

The safe response for secure systems is to reissue certs after patching impacted OpenSSL instances.

If the private keyvwas not leaked, then while we still have to deals with the security breach, we can at least avoid having to revoke and reissue all certs.

For example, they refused to reissue certificates for free after Heartbleed.

If Jill was merely "quoting", unless the rules of the exchange specify otherwise, she is free to reissue her quote and therefore perspective #1 makes sense.

Why not do a reissue with functionality closer to that of the original, based on the C64 DTV [1] which cost $20 or $25 when it was on the market, and sell it at a $50-to-$100 price point?

One could similarly work with NYC citygov digital team to anonymize the data properly and have them reissue an official dump, possibly with additional data from 2014.

Recovery process for this seems like it would be:- All affected sites need need to update OpenSSL, reissue certs, tell users to update their passwords.- All users need to reset their passwords, using a unique password for each site if possible.

Do remember that for every real serious problem such as this, American Express and any other large company receives a hundred or a thousand calls for non-issues like phishing or minor issues like a compromised card number to cancel and reissue.