recruitment

While LinkedIn does not intend to create fake recruitment attempts, it works out the same in the end.

Maybe admins don't want their site to be somewhere that stormfront considers to be their biggest recruitment center.

A lot of english-speaking countries prohibit recruitment services charging job seekers to prevent exploitation of vulnerable people.

Job offers from companies, I mean, not just mindless recruitment agency spam.

A soldier would be hard pressed to find a better recruitment tool to give the enemy.

Everyone involved in covering up our mistakes that served to further recruitment efforts of our enemies.

If you are interested send us an email recruitment@cloudacademy.com with your LinkedIn profile or CV and your availability (part-time or full-time).

I've only seen it done in mass-recruitment situations, like applicants for a graduate trainee scheme at a large company.

It is directly aiding the enemy by giving them a great recruitment tool.

But then I've got a friend who's been ripped-off by a recruitment agency, having folded with a couple of months pay due.

While open to it at some point, iirc he said there just wasn't the volume of potential clients down under to justify the legislation and recruitment investment.

Please note, we do not deal with any recruitment agencies or services.

When I say "no recruiters" I don't mean "no recruitment".

I hope the researchers a re well-meaning and that the study is more sophisticated than the abstract makes it seem, but it seems to have multiple potential problem areas: One-dimensional "extremism." Can they detect "white power" recruitment?

The first thing that popped into my head when I saw the advert you're featured in was "this is a really poor advertisement" either done with the explicit expectation of eliciting eyeballs (like most ads) or whipped up in last minute fashion with no real thought put into it (I didn't even realize it was a recruitment ad until I read your post).

> The first thing that popped into my head when I saw the advert you're featured in was "this is a really poor advertisement" either done with the explicit expectation of eliciting eyeballs (like most ads) or whipped up in last minute fashion with no real thought put into it (I didn't even realize it was a recruitment ad until I read your post).

Recruitment practices need to improve, no doubt, along with code reviews and how we do testing needs an overhaul, but the article is very high handed.