rancher

The intention is that Rancher will run below Docker.

What, did you, the cattle, think you could revolt against your rancher masters with impunity forever?

For clustering and management, you might try running RancerOS with Rancher the company's orchestration tool.

Also Joe is not a small investor, he's a rancher that buys lots of sheep.

The vision seems to be docker on top of rancher on top of docker?

Out of interest, how does rancher's network offering compare to weave/flannel?

Show your list to the rancher, see what he thinks.

So, a rancher says beef is good for the environment.

There are health benefits to the animals (the drugs prevent 'bloat'), but they also increase the weight gain per pound of feed, which the farmer (rancher?

My guess is that there is a higher fraction of agriculture/rancher/self employed that simply scale back employment rather than the binary in or out of a job.

The rancher should still cut back way before showers.

My favourite response was from an eccentric artist/rancher, who had made the three letters A R T in giant vinyl-covered foam blocks, and stacked them against a fence.

I think that's only because they don't see CoreOS as "minimal" in the same sense as Rancher and boot2docker.

I think it's more in the vein of "manage the docker containers you are deploying with rancher, which is itself another docker container to keep consistent with the entire environment being in docker"

"If the rancher is so evil, why does he give me bales of hay to chew on and allowed me to become the fattest cow?" "Evil" is (typically) not about actions or results, but about motivations and intent.

Rancher seems to be going in the other direction by making Docker support fully native.

Rancher currently wraps Docker but going forward that will no longer be the case.

Rancher is one that came up earlier today on HN.