policies

But the fact is, ad networks get compromised, and even ad networks that have strict policies for acceptable ads sometimes have bad actors slip through.

This combined with successful economic policies during the early 50s made Mao overly confident of his support base.

The US is well-know for having ambiguous policies.

What he advocated for them was as bad (if not worse) as his policies against the bourgeois.

Extremely poor air quality in major cities has spurred the Chinese government to adopt clean-air policies.

Unless additional policies similar to net neutrality are implemented the web with end up an afterthought in the near future.

Although Switzerland and America may have very different work cultures and social support policies, that's not the most obvious difference.

OpaquePRF in particular was explicitly about getting TLS to play well with the Suite B policies.

We can separate out which cities have liberal views from which cities have put liberal urban planning policies in place.

We can and have set policies, for example, to disallow autoplay video or audio ads.

All the mentioned countries are successfull capitalistic countries with better safeguards and policies.

On the web, fine print policies don't matter in the end.

And since those tend to be more liberal areas, we ascribe "liberal" to those policies as a descriptor.

As a reaction he locked up "naysayers" and implemented radical ideological-based economic policies that ended up in disaster, so he stepped down for a few years.

I challenge anyone who complains about the "new"[1] data logging in Windows 10 to take a hard look at Google's policies as well.

(I guess this has resently changed per wikipedia: "Registration policies have been liberalised somewhat in recent years and rules such as the one against registering generic domain names have been dropped.

Policies like the one you describe are just a market inefficiency that doesn't have a real justification for existing (outside of your own interests).