law-abiding

The bottom-line problem seems to be that law-abiding people don't have much experience with being treated like criminals.

We need developers to agree, as human beings rather than law-abiding citizens, not to build these things.

My point is, every decent, moral, law-abiding citizen is unconcerned about the need for any article such as this.

It's harder to blast the NRA when you're actually talking about millions of law-abiding, rights-exercising citizens.

This could lead to a perverse outcome in which law-abiding organizations and individuals lack protected communications but malicious actors have them.

The way I think many of them deal with this is by over-controlling obviously harmless, law-abiding people.

Innocent and law-abiding citizens are the only ones getting hurt with this mindset.

You wouldn't have any argument about the risk of criminal liability from unintended contraband download, because no law-abiding user would ever get that far.

If I were a law-abiding millennial trying to buy a house in one of these markets I would be extremely frustrated.

Every decent, moral, law-abiding citizen should be outraged that the people responsible for safeguarding us and upholding the law are violating it on a regular basis.

Rational people realize that they have nothing to fear from law-abiding gun owners who only want to be prepared to protect their loved ones from evil people.

Why are entire neighborhoods off-limits to law-abiding citizens?