citizen

Countries tend to claim jurisdiction whenever a citizen is killed, no matter where it happens.

Currently a French citizen can have content from any website delisted, no matter where it's hosted, from google.fr.

Each norwegian citizen is like Warren Buffett, they sit on a shitload of money but you can't tell.

Behaving like a good citizen just gives a website less revenue, and gains them pretty much nothing.

It was far more broad, attacking ones citizen neighbors simply because they were landowners, for example.

All that with a clean superb environment, beautiful countryside and diversity baked into every citizen (4 official languages in one country...).

Also, police should protect the citizen more than themselves, therefore when in doubt, don't shoot and take the risk of being shot.

Certainly the average citizen must have at least some forms of state provided protection from the rich and powerful and poverty safety nets.

I might be more aware of this, subconsciously, than your typical citizen of the USA because my wife is Mexican.

My hypothesis for US companies is that the number of non-techies supported by each US citizen engineer is going up at an even greater rate.

Moving won't help you if you are a US citizen.

I can't challenge France's law in court as a US citizen, so why should I be denied access to information at their discretion?

By the time the median HN user is a "senior citizen", Social Security eligibility will start at what, 87?

But I was thinking someone from a group like Consumers Union or even Public Citizen (if they're not still considered too "radical").

>>"merely because they represent an average citizen." I think as in most discussions, balance between viewpoints is what must be sought.

Someone who is lower down on the earning rung of society (say earning the median US income), has a far more accurate view of the "average" society than someone who is at the very top, merely because they represent an average citizen.