holder

The only part that is covered by penalty of perjury is that the person making the claim is, or is authorised by, the copyright holder.

They were correct to leave his name as copyright holder, as doing anything different would mean that they stole his copyright, which they did not.

Thus every existing holder gets an equal amount of dilution, and the number of conceivable rounds is infinite.

What about the situation with east Texas where they side with the patent holder the majority of the time?

Does this mean that if Instagram or Twitter terms does not allow scraping of their user's generated content, any developer can just go ahead and do it because the copyright holder of the post is the user?

It is more like a car dealership putting their dealership license-plate holder and the car make/model sticker on the back.

That bank account will pay interest to the holder, because as you point out so nicely, that's exactly what banks do.

It's his money, he's the capital-holder, he can do what he wants with it.

That would at least prevent the absurd scenario where a patent holder waits for their technology to become widespread before starting to prosecute.

Teams of lawyers for every major copyright holder already have a tool that lets them take down any pirated content that they want.

Unless of course you are setting up a bank account for each separate user, in which case the holder could be the user in trust.

The Tesla doesn't come with a holder for my buggy whip.

It doesn't say "the lifetime of the copyright holder at expiration," unless I've missed something.

Such a change would be controversial, but it would solve the "household problem" since now whoever lives there gets the prime no matter what their relationship to the account holder or similar.

- The prime account holder gets a certain number of prime "credits" they can use to send prime packages to other physical addresses, like friends and relatives.

We're called the "support" department, but we don't field calls about "my cup holder is broken." We're much more likely to have someone turn compile 20K lines of C++ code with optimizations for the first time and have them tell us there's a bug in the compiler; but in reality their program has some undefined behavior that happens to behave differently with optimizations on -- and it's our job to find it!