gadgets

OS support for running controls/widgets (gadgets in AmigaOS) in separate threads ensures a high degree of responsiveness even when the machine is under high load.

Apple needs a chief who lives gadgets, demands perfection, and most importantly grew up poor, or middle class.

On one hand, it's nice to have standalone fanless gadgets, perhaps running demos as background noise.

Those generating ROP gadgets would have to wait till the application restarts to try again.

And it doesn't even make for interesting small talk like some expensive gadgets.

These gadgets are chained together via the stack, which contains the exploit payload.

We build custom gadgets for small (1 to 10000) classes of users.

ROP essentially involves finding existing snippets of code from the program (called gadgets) and jumping to them, such that you produce a desired outcome.

Additionally, generating ROP gadgets blindly can cause the application to segfault (and in the demo I watched, it did multiple times).

That's where you can create real value as a newspaper, fluff articles about gadgets not so much, the barrier to entry is way too low.

You don't need a car, a house, or the latest gadgets.

For those using a local account and having no use for these gadgets, would firewall rules be enough to prevent Windows from leaking data to Microsoft?

This is also quoted on CNN feeds under the title "Intel's miracle chip could make your gadgets 1,000 times faster".

But I think Apple tapped a brand new market with the iPod: the "fashionable gadgets" market.

The same "logic" will be applied to other gadgets.

* Apple's marketing chief, Phil Schiller, said that "One of Apple's employees works closely with Hollywood on so-called product placement so its gadgets are used in movies and television shows.