fossils

So if find fossils, does that mean dinosaurs never went extinct?

Here is an example: horse fossils are found physically above t-rex fossils 99.9% of the time, and in the remaining cases, the rocks show evidence of upheaval in that area.

There was an article in SciAm about living fossils recently and how inappropriate that term really is.

And while the interpretation of the earliest fossils of life is debatable, we can say that some 3.6 billion years old remains probably are fossils of bacteria.

Generally cost of battery backup looks like 35c/kWh and has limitations on duration so it must come back to fossils.

We, like all apex predators before us, will soon become extinct from this planet leaving only fossils in our wake.

Nuclear is the only technology which offers a base load without burning fossils.

I'm a somewhat older programmer, and fwiw, I've met as many genuinely unhireable fossils as I've heard this complaint.

Yes, I know, it's still from Earth, but I do think it's a weird way of looking at dinosaur fossils.

For fossils, of course, there almost always only morphological evidence for species.

What gets me is that we're taught Earth's fossil fuels are just that: biological fossils.

Mining is almost entirely powered by fossils, it has to be.

I can't help but notice that the skeleton's head is thrown back as in the somewhat-mysterious "death pose"[0] that dinosaur fossils are typically found in.