dualistic

There's little sense in using a dualistic lens when it comes to solutions that have a cost.

Her dualistic approach was a teaching tool meant to demonstrate that the first set of rules was morally superior.

You're espousing quite a narrow point of view of a philosophy that is about supplanting dualistic closemindedness.

Just a note to some people replying to 'bkst: what Berkeley developed was a kind of monistic (not dualistic ) system.

Cultures who have a dualistic view of God or a polytheistic cosmos don't have monotheism's same sort of problem of evil.

After centuries of thought, humanity has developed some concepts beyond dualistic black & white.

The agent model of AI is a bit too dualistic to be correct.

We must also always remember that dualistic free will is an illusion.

Perhaps the dualistic East/Western modes of viewing the world aren't enough.

Then I think reality is just too messy for the nice dualistic explanation.

You seem to have a dualistic view on this.

Only if you believe in dualistic free will.

The second point is that drawing a line between the "world" and your beliefs about it is a pretty dopey dualistic way of thinking.

And from a logical perspective, you don't mean "dualistic", you mean "excluded-middle" or "false dilemma".

I recommend "hard problem of consciousness" on wikipedia, I think it's at the core of all arguments against the non-dualistic, materialistic worldview.

As the dualistic superstition took root in our ancestors' minds, their first task was to destroy all aspects of ecstatic, experiential religion from the archaic ("pagan") world.

Dualistic solution-centric thinking is an issue with our times.