casio

Finally, the author complains that the Apple Watch will never be timeless, then straps on a Casio G-Shock.

He acts like the rest of the market doesn't exist or is irrelevant, but $20 Casio watches are.

If so many people around you wear a Casio ProTrek PRW-3000-1, that's a silly situation, isn't it?

My watch is the $90 (sadly out-of-production) Casio MDV-102 [1] which is a real cult classic.

Actually the Casio versions of such watches were quite cool among us back in the 80's.

A $30 Casio keeps better time than a handmade mechanical watch at 1,000 times the price.

My first computer was a Casio calculator (so, basically not a computer) with monochrome screen.

I had a Casio calculator watch that also included a video game for the ultimate in nerd entertainment.

And for a 'sports' watch, just a cheap velcro-strap casio/timex with a stopwatch function is all I need.

In fact, a $15 Casio is much more accurate than a $7000 Omega.

A $15 Casio can tell time just as accurately as a $5000 Omega.

I used to dream about the HP 48GX, but my budget only allowed for a Casio FX-880P.

No, "industry standard" for sport watches is 50-100 meter depth.[1] All Casio's sport watches can handle that.

This is basically the "add finest cheap Casio digital watch technology to motherboard" option.

I recall writing a mandelbrot program on my Casio (in the awful Casio basic) in the late 90s, after reading Ivar Peterson's "The Mathematical Tourist" (actually started with Sierpinski Gasket variations, as that is much easier, not to mention faster).

My watch (Casio ProTrek PRW-3000-1) has compass, altimeter, world time, sunrset times, alarms and so on.

Then the million dollar chunk of metal loses to the $5 Casio.

I had a cheaper $1000 Omega and got rid of it for a cheap Casio.