biomarker

Pretty much all the pathophysiology is consistent with a stress related illness, including this interferon-gamma biomarker.

How substantive is an n=1 anecdote about some biomarker interventions with no hard endpoints?

I really think that with heart failure, we need the biomarker equivalent of somatic pre-cancerous DNA changes in cancer.

Then they went trawling for biomarker in a sea of millions of biomarkers.

I'm not aware of anything else that is presently as promising as a biomarker of aging.

These drugs work by increasing the levels of a biomarker called dystrophin.

It is a biomarker for meat, eggs, and fish in the diet.

They assumed the premise basically -- we should find a biomarker, which is kind of what this thread is discussing.

That some circRNAs are lower in cancer than in normal tissue is a reliably detectable difference and is precisely what makes them an excellent biomarker.

Anybody want to fund my prostate cancer biomarker discovery project?

So, in addition to the effects of creatine in a young persons body, it may be a biomarker for wealth, assuming vegetarians are a small enough minority.

Well we have plenty of biomarker candidates (aka human genome project) and, following them will come plenty of monoclonals, which should be relatively easy to humanize.

Sometimes you can show that you are impacting a biomarker (which I assume is what you mean by "some number"), but there must be evidence that changing the biomarker impacts the disease.

There's additional evidence shown here: "Using circular RNA as a novel type of biomarker in the screening of gastric cancer".

There are standard procedures for avoiding overfitting in developing "omic" biomarker tests, which, of course, the authors did not follow.

Therefore, based on that J% increase in HDL-C, we expect a K% decrease in heart disease if HDL-C is a causal biomarker." What was the result?