binder

If the point is to have Android style IPC, why not just pull a version of Binder into the mainline kernel?

Literally, they bet the whole company and a binder full of credit cards on Obama O's, a gimmick cereal.

After going through months and months of Microsoft/Sony/Nintendo certification on a 3-ring binder full of technical requirements?

Of course they kept the printouts in a binder in the common area of the hostel...

But that doesn't apply in this case because the binder in question isn't marked in any kind of meaningful way.

Their entire working lives circumscribed by a binder written by people so many levels above them that thinking about it risks vertigo.

This sounds a lot like Android's binder mechanism for inter-process communication.

I've printed this book out and have it sitting in a binder on my bookshelf.

In pretty much every class I ever took-- I would sit down-- I would open my organized binder to the corresponding course.

Now is the time for Linus to disappear for a few days, and re-emerge with a sane IPC design that both binder and dbus can build on.

I think I had a printed copy of this in a binder.

It's not much more work to carry a small 3-ring binder along with the notepad and resume folder I typically carry to an interview.

The binder is a chemical known as "Portland Cement"; it hardens when it combines chemically with water.

Android's Binder was already merged into the Linux kernel (not just "staging", the real thing) since 3.19...

You also need to translate "with" as a forall (pi binder) as well.

As far As I can remember in mailling list one of kernel developer mention "android IPC (Its name I think is binder) is completely broken", He didn't mention any evidence for his claim.

Binder was created to solve the same problem (Linux IPC was too slow) but uses somewhat different approaches.

Binder is not 2% of the mass of the pill.