wrapper

The performance hit from that wrapper is pretty close to zero.

*either that or the wrapper would have caught fire and burned the whole terminal down.

A wrapper function is absolutely the right way.

When he finished his hot dog, he threw the messy wrapper directly onto the carpet.

Gumbo's Python wrapper should be a drop-in replacement for html5lib.

Over 1 billion monthly pageviews for r/funny in a pretty wrapper.

But the bad part is that Microsoft does not make easy with a wrapper exposing WinSock-like API based on their new API.

Doesn't have an ORM/mapper per-say but they have a small jdbc wrapper that allows you to map your classes using Scala combinators syntax [3].

So CoffeeScript isn't just a wrapper around JavaScript, but it really changes its behavior.

The difference comes when jQuery isn't just a wrapper - likely for things where there are browser differences or performance improvements by doing things a different way.

However, lists by default form an applicative functor with pairwise application rather than zipping; there is a wrapper called ZipList that does a normal zip.

So I guess the answer is ultimately 'deal with it'.That said, I don't see this taking 'months' either, they could just write a wrapper function that mimics the old behaviour and their tests should cover it.

On the other hand, there are a lot of people who write computational libraries, but know they have to translate them to matlab, or write a matlab wrapper and pray that their users can get it to compile which might sound simple to folks here, but is really frustrating for less computationally oriented people when something goes wrong.