bann

The problem is that many others would have as much reason to bann US companies.

As soon as Google (or law...) declares a specific tactic as bann-worthy people will use it against their competitors.

You can bann cigarettes for 18yo and under and then increase the age limit once a year by a year.

For example antiwork will bann anyone talking slightly positive about companies, which includes correcting false information.

For me the bann in the tweeter account is baseless and unfair independently of the opinion you might have about him.

One day, the bann hammer (rightfully so!) hit me hard and I lost all my accounts.

It would be the morally correct thing to bann generative AI as it only benefits corporations and doesn't improve the life of the people but makes it worse.

Indeed, there's been calls to get rid of it all, all the layers and whatnot, and bann the OS from all but one or two cores and get rid of the whole network stack and layers and implement the networking directly in the application that needs to do it.

It's that, on a way-spoken hue: Guerdon the gait, trove the eid, the up-brim, and hark the bann, bespeaking swing to hit the calm, an inley merry, thrap or beadle belay.

> there's been calls to get rid of it all, all the layers and whatnot, and bann the OS from all but one or two cores and get rid of the whole network stack and layers and implement the networking directly in the application that needs to do it You certainly know building and supporting that would cost more or less the same as building and operating a sizeable datacenter.

The "100 times" aside, some subs actually have rules about posting facts and will bann you for it.

The final stage beeing the Opt player kill & Bann.