banks

Insikt was born out of our realization that banks will not be the lenders of tomorrow – brands will.

The federal antitrust commission intervened after banks filed a lawsuit to stop Sofort from using their websites.

Ideally banks would provide a nice API, but without a good enough reason they're just not interested.

Major banks, hedge funds, startups, government and enterprise are lining up simultaneously as customers and investors.

DKB) now started to cooperate with Sofort instead and the German banks will start a similar service themselves this year.

The basic premise is you put in half moon banks every n 100 meters.

Unfortunately, banks are technically backward and don't realise they're dumb vaults yet, much in the same way phone carriers are dumb pipes.

If I remember correctly, a number of banks specify that providing credentials to a third party isn't allowed.

I think some banks provide a view only access so you can give it to sites like mint.

He was hurling dynamite at avalanche banks when I found him, coding amazing apps with little revenue potential.

If we had banks small enough to fail, they'd still concentrate but to a much smaller degree.

Slate also documents the banks going public, again prior to repealing Glass-Steagall.

It'll be, "before the government started helping, we lived off food stamps and food banks, but it was never enough.

Banks are providing more and more "Mint-like" analytic services for their customers.

The "nice API" comment is something that struck me after using mint for a couple years: there are banks/brokerages out there who are set up for this sort of thing and handle it well: tokens, revocation, etc.

Banks generally don't like it (for obvious security/privacy reasons), but are cautious in actually preventing it.

Banks are pretty much the only institution that's allowed to commingle client funds with their own funds, and they're subject to a whole bunch of extra regulations and scrutiny as a result.