asimov

Moorcock - a much much more inferior artist than asimov, dick, heinlein and tolkien - will never accomplish.

So it's definitely there, although Asimov never actually portrayed the revolution itself.

Somehow, this reminds me of an Asimov tale.

It seems possible that when Asimov first conceived of the laws of robotics, he thought it would all work out very nicely and only realised the negative consequences later.

The moral of Asimov stories was that it is impossible to encode morality as a simple set of rules, as the complexity of real life will always produce unpredictable situations, and ethics will provide ambiguous answers depending on which principles are considered more important.

Isaac Asimov: "There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been.

Also, in Asimov's literary canon, the robots ultimately destroy themselves on the reasoning that having them around was crippling humanity.

The whole point of Asimov's laws was that naively encoded moral rules can have horrific consequences.

Asimov may be right at some point in the future, but he's not right now.

Isaac Asimov, Benjamin Franklin, Richard Feynman, and many many other famous public intellectuals have argued for the simplification of English spelling.

Asimov had a great perspective on the various ways humans would react to robots.

I've read quite a bit of Asimov, did you notice it's the same story over and over again?

Isaac Asimov: "There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been.

There's a great short story called "The Last Answer," by Isaac Asimov.[1] In it, a scientist dies and is preserved by a "god" to think for eternity.

Also, in Asimov's literary canon, the robots ultimately destroy themselves on the reasoning that having them around was crippling humanity.

The whole point of Asimov's laws was that naively encoded moral rules can have horrific consequences.

Asimov may be right at some point in the future, but he's not right now.