arial

Hint: changing the font to Arial improves readability a lot and actually displays italics where the author used them.

Just changing it to something smoother like Ubuntu or Arial would make it 10x better for me.

The default font verdana looks like blah, I think arial looks nicer, at least to me.

So yes, they shouldn't avoid warrants by way of arial surveillence (e.g.

I still think that Arial and Times are the pinnacle of typographic design.

Most consumers will tell you that they can't tell apart Arial and any other sans-serif font; yet many companies decide that a proprietary font is a vital identity asset.

I still think that loading the ubuntu font from google fonts would be better (and then using arial/tmr as a fallback) but to each their own.

The Siemens Sans font [1] is particularly fascinating: It is a very subtle modification of the ubiquitous Frutiger font [2]; most people would probably tell you that even Frutiger looks like Arial too them.

The last time we saw many of them was in Vietnam (think of it: we haven't had an arial shooting war in 40 years, covering generations of (thankfully) unutilized planes and pilots).

I'd expect that they know a lot about fonts - yet, when you look at their own source: font-family:arial,sans-serif; Why don't they buy at least one really high quality font from (for example) Linotype?

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go back to deleting 17 extra Master Slides, adjusting page numbers so they all align, re-pasting graphics from Excel as Enhanced Metafiles instead of JPGs, fixing the header font size to be consistent, and wondering what kind of demon decided to change the font from Arial to Calibri in random places!

What I am saying is there's nothing inherently wrong with arial surveillance, to the point where everyone who works for companies offering such services is "evil".

<font face=”Arial” size=”1″>: yeah, dont' use that, use CSS.

Helvetica and Arial make it hard to distinguish the "l"s from the "i"s, while the other two have distinguishing features: a round dot and sloped stem for FF Meta, and the little overhang on FF Unit.

Word 2007 blurs the distinctions he's making, because it started putting in formats like "Title" and "Body" instead of just "14pt" and "Arial" (or verdanna or whatever).

Non-Helvetica/Arial could be an option rather than default, for people who don't want to load an external font.

The clarity with which you express your ideas is far more important than your use of Verdana rather than Arial.

Arial surveillance has the distinct advantage of safely observing a public area under their jurisdiction.