accusations

Simple, arrest and charge the girl for making false accusations, with a minimum of 20 years in prison.

If you're going to make accusations like this, at least have the stomach to put your name behind it.

Of course responding to these accusations takes extraordinary amounts of time -- which is the point.

Where is the point in erecting this building of accusations if the foundations aren't sound?

Are you going to make baseless accusations or are you going to cite an example we can debate?

Mostly reasonable comments with a couple of sort of unfounded accusations of trolling.

They never own up to their own wrong doing, make very strong accusations....

But Google's smaller-scale bans and reorderings, always for ostensibly legitimate purposes, have sometimes caused accusations about Google's real goals by the webmasters affected.

HN users aren't allowed to make baseless accusations of abuse against other commenters.

Have any of them made any statements that support your accusations that they lied, or are you just making up those accusations yourself, or parroting someone else's accusations that Brendan Eich and the Mozilla board are liars?

Making wrong and evasive arguments is bad, but destroying civil discourse (which such accusations do) is, to use a good military-industrial phrase, an existential threat.

Your accusations that it's racist or discrimination is just not correct.

In contrast, all accusations on treason for the unconstitutional passing of information to the NSA have been dropped so far for "lack of evidence".

In particular the accusations of racism regarding her peer bonuses, telling the "known racist" to "fuck off", etc.