vertices

In most you just pick some vertices and a gizmo shows up letting you manipulate the vertices.

The 4 colour theorem is about colouring an arbitrary planar graph such that adjacent vertices have different colours.

Just add the number of vertices to the number of faces, then subtract the number of edges.

Coloring the vertices of a planar graph is the same problem as coloring the regions of a different planar graph.

Now imagine scaling this up to a couple of hundred vertices and you see how this quickly becomes a hideous mess.

How toy blocks are toy blocks, whether they're made of wood or abstract vertices; No.

Why don't you draw directly your vertices in gl instead of create a tex?

If you can present shaders as for loops over the input vertices or pixels, it might be more clear than just a bunch of diagrams.

As you point out, I computed the number of rectangles that aren't permitted to have all its vertices the same color.

There are plenty of untaken vertices in the serialization-format hypercube.

First, we're not looking for all of the vertices to be different colors.

> that maps OpenGL primitives onto SQL result sets Here is a set of vertices, now draw me a 2d image that represents the 3d scene those vertices represent from a certain viewpoint.

However, "traditional" graph databases like Neo4j require everything to be structured in terms of vertices and edges.

It's a database that stores a "graph" of vertices that are connected by edges.

Slightly off-topic but I always found it infuriating to call binary trees "binary" when some vertices have a degree = 3.

The operations "Vertices" and "Scale" force each shape to be redrawn so there are a lot of textures being uploaded and deleted every frame this scenario.