vehicles

If CA really wants to push people into electric vehicles, why not manipulate the demand for electric vehicles?

Could still be true if 2000 new for-hire vehicles are being added every month, and 1000 old for-hire vehicles are removed.

The renderer is used to help design and simulate vehicles.

Back then, the first electric vehicles were being piloted on the road, and then California tried to create some sort of mandate to force all vehicles to eventually become electric.

Mandating that auto manufacturers sell a certain percentage of electric vehicles seems a bit like legislating the weather.

On the other hand, the auto manufacturers are perfectly capable of achieving this end result by themselves: Just subsidize the sale of electric vehicles by raising the price on non-electric vehicles.

We have our own drone testing site (and a variety of off-road vehicles) & encourage all our employees to fly.

Because ICE vehicles last decades and they don't have expensive battery packs that need replacing.

Serious question: unless all the electricity for these vehicles comes from completely renewable and environmentally friendly sources, won't banning fossil fuel emissions from motor vehicles just externalize this pollution onto electric power plants?

My only concern with electric vehicles is battery end of life.

But doesn't this equally apply to fully-electric vehicles as well?

It makes sense to me: they're forcing the automakers to subsidize the R&D of electric vehicles from their profits on ICE vehicles, which seems like a normal thing for a business to do when it benefits the business.

<10% of autos are electric, but i'll just remove 10% to round nicely, and say "18 million non-electric vehicles.

The easy way to do it is to just ask, "When have we been unable to destroy enemy vehicles or structures due to extra planes?" We did it in Iraq faster than ever with our current configuration of various, specialized aircraft.

A total change of 6,205 new cars over 6 months amounts to roughly 1,000 new for-hire vehicles a month - about one half of the rate that de Blasio had said in his OpEd." This argument assumes (with no justification) that the cars have been added at a constant rate.

Marchionne, who took over the bailed-out Chrysler in 2009 to form Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, warned that if all he could sell were electric vehicles, he would be right back looking for another govern­ment rescue." In order to meet the fuel economy standards, car companies have been building cars that nobody actually buys to bring up their averages.