vanilla

Has anybody else felt that way and did you go forward with TS or stick with vanilla JS?

And the device builds have deviated far enough from vanilla Android+kernel that they require their own.

All default emacs keyboard shortcuts would always work, so learning vanilla emacs is still helpful.

Isn't that the same as using vanilla laziness: > let xs = [1, 2, (xs!!

Yes, plain-old C like plain-old vanilla ice cream, as compared to C++ like swirly rainbow vanilla chocolate strawberry template macro class inherits from a waffle cone with generic unique pointer functor sprinkles ice cream.

This is a huge improvement over vanilla Docker, but it's still pretty low level.

I mean actually using vanilla Android as your host.

Otherwise, we'd all be writing vanilla JS and sacrificing what matters most - getting things done.

Asynchronous, non-real-time schemes that look like vanilla web traffic are the best.

And of course class redefinition is a pretty vanilla dynamic language feature.

Plus, you've released a few, unusual examples where the vast majority of patches are to vanilla vulnerabilities in software that provide us little, learning experience.

I don't know but in the end I stopped caring about themes, vanilla emacs (light) is good 99% of the time.

However, if you find yourself falling back to vanilla, then your code is not "optimal" in terms of cross-browser compatibility.

"Asynchronous, non-real-time schemes that look like vanilla web traffic are the best." It's a shame that high-latency mix networks died out with Mixminion [1] a few years ago.

I'd say it was the number of ads on the sites I was going to but I went to the same sites in Chrome without an adblocker (Vanilla Chrome) and it handled it without a sweat.