tubal

And on top of the reversibility, vasectomy is a much simpler out-patient procedure compared to tubal ligation (which means lower risk of complications).

Doctors not performing tubal ligations on women and other afab people under 30 is pure, unadulterated misogyny.

What if you're childfree and intend to remain that way, beyond your childbearing years, or you've had a vasectomy/tubal ligation?

It was pretty common at the eighties exchange votes for gas, dentures or even tubal ligation.

Any medical professional that turns down, for example, a hormonal treatment or tubal ligation or vasectomy...

For example, imagine someone with Bipolar disorder in the midst of a manic episode scheduling and performing a tubal ligation.

Why else would you have a vasectomy or tubal ligation if not for contraceptive reasons?

If you have Tubal Ligation your odds of getting it successfully reversed is 1%[1].

Is it your understanding that tubal ligation cannot, under any circumstance, be reversed?

Oh wait… I imagine they’ll make that illegal too and Tubal Ligation and, hell, Condoms too.

What if the government offered free tubal ligation and vasectomy.

They just call out the surgery in an attempt to claim that with a tubal ligation, talc should be blocked from moving up the fallopian tubes.

Probably through the form of "discounts" for having vasectomies or tubal litigation.

They did address this and noted that in patients with tubal ligation the talc distribution was different and lymphatic rather than “mechanical” through the fallopian tubes.

"Among the five patients in the main study, two had a history of tubal ligation" Oh man!

Her “husband” seems to have abandoned her though but I don’t imagine getting a hysterectomy or tubal ligation for a destitute woman in rural Uganda is easy to come by.

Tubal ligation is already inaccessible to the women who would want it for lifetime contraception.

Tubal ligation regret maxes at 20.3%[2].