truthfulness

The thing is that someone's 'eyesight' (of their individual consciousness) is a function of their own individual degree of truthfulness.

I did assume that the reader is familiar with the metaphor irrespective of its truthfulness.

This article skews towards trying to make a political point, but it does so at the cost of truthfulness.

A discussion about the messenger shouldn't be seen as a dicussion about the truthfulness of the message.

All the features of something which is good or bad are determined by degree of truthfulness.

Just because something is or is not a traditional belief has no bearing on its truthfulness.

If it isn't seen as a discussion about the truthfulness of the message, it should be seen as completely worthless gossip.

What we account as the truth in books is based around the idea of truthfulness of a particular author.

Degree of truthfulness can be defined as the degree of exactness of confirmation.

What religion you get indoctrinated into has very little to do with its truthfulness, but everything to do with where you were born.

Not being able to recognize others' capacity without truthfulness, we need to be very careful about trusting our own judgements.

Rational mind has no option but to accept their truthfulness (sometimes after laborious examination of evidence or step by step verification of logical deduction).

There is discussion about the truthfulness of "de bello Gallico".

"Incorrect" is a better word to gauge the truthfulness of the opinions.

"You are claiming that you are able to parse and analyze his statements for their truthfulness, whereas the rest of the public will be hoodwinked" Oh really?