trucks

There's also that you have to burn fuel in the tank trucks to get the fuel to the consumer.

There are lots of trucks, resulting in many accidents nationwide, but they are far safer than the average driver.

Just so you know, trucks (F150, Silverado, RAM) have been consistently selling in the top 5 spots.

We stopped by the depot for shipments and saw at keast 6 trucks full of water.

It would certainly be awesome if they didn't attack your trucks because you're simply taking food & essentials to people.

A peripheral concern is the direct job loss of the millions of truck drivers as self-driving semi tractor trucks are developed.

Drones and trucks are expensive and the finance guys would prefer the absolute minimum be owned and deliveries be made 24x7.

Mobile drone hubs seems like a very interesting solution, which could even be more energy-efficient than just trucks or just drones.

I'm pretty sure Amazon doesn't have to think too much about Hartal or their delivery trucks being burned.

UPS owns warehouses, trucks, and planes, none of which are very defensible advantages.

I always pictured trucks driving from distribution centers, and deploying drones that cover an area.

How much will the rejected energy output decrease as we switch to electric cars, and even moreso electric buses and cargo trucks?

To continue to abuse that analogy, Trucks are probably selling better now than 20 years ago because they are "cheap" luxury cars.

But generally, no matter what sane thing you do to these numbers, halve them, double them (maybe cheaper cars use crappier batteries/engines, maybe they mean light trucks too, etc), it's still "a lot of extra to plan for".