trains

People can take their bikes on S-trains, which come from >20km from the centre.

There is a lot of people who live in Greater Copenhagen (Cph and cities around it) and commute to the centre by S-trains.

At least with trains, roads and airports, we can move away from the source of pollution.

I do wish Baltics had something similar to ghost trains but I understand it is the privilege of richer countries.

Some of the ghost trains, eg Paddinton to Ruislip, cross these boundaries.

Some people get sent to ThoughtWorks University which basically trains them to code, work in an agile environment and how to be a good consultant.

---------------------------------------------------------- For example the Chinese had 0 miles of high speed trains in 2009.

I have never seen buses and trains being profitable.

Not sure I can accept the premise, because as the article states, Lewinski doesn't just defend, he also actively trains officers and publishes papers on reasonable use of force.

(Shipped across the ocean, trains, refinery, delivered to a gas station, travels with the car until burned.) - Electric vehicles last longer.

- Trains & Rail supports Rail station auto-complete and information.

The middle (San Francisco) doesn't have enough people to support good public transit (buses/trains stopping every 5 minutes or less) 24 hrs a day, but has so many people that the roads are gridlocked.

This is like saying "it's not my fault that trains have a lot of mass and kinetic energy", after you are warned against pushing people in front of them and do it anyway.

Trains would be quite useless if they did not have a lot of mass and kinetic energy.

Trains now are nearly unusable, always running late, always being broken, etc.