tacitly

If you believe that options are worthless and will always be worthless, aren't you tacitly saying you believe the company is worthless and will always remain that way?

If you chose to engage in a system, financial or otherwise, than you tacitly accept it's rules and regulations.

We're certainly a little bit racist, because we're tacitly accepting the underlying premise: not my problem, I'm OK.

On the one hand, one tacitly feels contemptuous towards the other group and tries to come across as dispassionate in their appraising comment.

However, are they so reactionary as to represent to the organizers a position that they don't want to even tacitly or obliquely endorse?

For obvious reasons the PS3 can't directly play pirated mkv files, which is the target use (albeit tacitly) for many of these streaming boxes.

In a few cases, they appear to have tacitly approved of some.

Even NPR appears to tacitly approve of all of it because terrorism.

Imagine that if your backpack is vacant for some time, and someone put tacitly someting into it, you'd be legally obliged to carry it around.

Frankly the number of people in these threads defending the overly dangerous demo scares me, as does the number of people who seem to tacitly encourage such behavior.

Of course the alternative view is to blame these folks and tacitly assume that the right to a comfortable lifestyle with a couple kids is a luxury only for the rich.

Calling Tolkien a crypto fascist is a bit much — I doubt Tolkien had a fascist agenda — but Tolkien's tacitly assumed worldview is pretty disturbing upon examination.

It's a misconception that litigating companies tacitly condone, because it paints them in a more sympathetic light, but it's not actually "required" by any stretch of imagination.

Is tacitly calling for a specific persons murder "criticism"?

And perhaps even worse, when you have questions like "what gender are you?" that are asked often and where most questioners only accept male / female, that reinforces the incorrect idea that gender is binary and that there are only 2 answers, and effectively tacitly condones other forms of discrimination centered around the same question of personal identity.

And, to add another layer of hypocrisy, how can you tacitly encourage opinions such as those of Eich/Card -- which are inherently stifling of the freedom of others to associate, and is a "hands-on" approach to the lives of others -- while saying that Github should take a "hands-off" role here when it comes to the use of language?