snarkiness

When you think of what you want in a discussion forum, how high are sarcasm and snarkiness on your list?

I think it would help decrease your snarkiness meter reading if you also provided some specific, constructive, criticism.

This kind of snarkiness is one of the most damaging things there are.

You're a post count leader here but either I am overly sensitive to reading snarkiness or I simply don't understand.

We get it: it's the Internet, and trolls, snarkiness, and differing opinions come with the territory.

Sorry, I couldn’t resist;) Snarkiness aside, I do care about what the non-glowing part looks like.

This wasn't really explicit in the article, but a lot of it came across as frustration at the overwhelming negativity or snarkiness in forums/mailing lists/etc.

I say this with no snarkiness, I wish people would proof read articles they publish.

I used a bit of tongue in cheek snarkiness to drive the point home.

If snarkiness tends to be this predictable, I wonder what kinds of data analysis can be done just using certain recurring phrases.

Minus the snarkiness, that's not a bad question.

My earlier snarkiness was caused by frustration at how quickly people are willing to dismiss feminism or make sweeping generalisations about it, without bothering to learn much about it.

I'm tempted to write "[citation needed]", but to avoid snarkiness, I'll rephrase as: What are you talking about?

Snarkiness aside, think about what the "value" is/was that cable brought to the transaction.

Sorry about the snarkiness, I was aiming rather for "opinionated".

I enjoy your snarkiness daniel, but I think it's a bit more complex than "I'm so clever", FDE is a feature of MacOSX, Ubuntu, and..

Snarkiness aside, constructive criticism: Somewhere accessible by train and car would be ideal.